Leading painters
top-notch painters paint what they think is good.
A second-rate painter paints what the public thinks is good.
A third-rate painter paints what he thinks "the public thinks is good.
explanation
Third-rate painters paint what they think "the public will think is good," but in reality it is not.
self-serving assumption
If you can actually draw "what the public thinks is good", you are promoted to second class.
But first-class is not an extension of this. As long as it is measured by the world's evaluation, it stops at second class.
A common misconception: "If you paint what you think is good, you're top-notch."
You've got your logic backwards.
Paint only what you think is good and often die unappreciated.
school (position) hard to enter (get)
I'm trying to find the source of this because I remember seeing it in something, but I haven't found it.
Pointing out that it is Fernando Pessoa.
A first-rate poet says what he actually feels, a second-rate poet says what he thinks he feels, and a third-rate poet says what he thinks he must feel
Quite similar.
I guess I read someone else's modification/explanation of this as the original story, and that further denatured it for me.
Third-rate consultants speak by example
Second-rate consultants speak with data.
Leading consultants speak with their hearts.
Discontinuous growth is not an extension of fact.
Jun Kuikei
Related Topics.
Pleasing the masses is evil.
The world is you, isn't it?
Other examples of trisection humans
Great people talk about ideas.
---
This page is auto-translated from /nishio/一流の画家 using DeepL. If you looks something interesting but the auto-translated English is not good enough to understand it, feel free to let me know at @nishio_en. I'm very happy to spread my thought to non-Japanese readers.